eduimpact.ai Empowering educators. Inspiring students. Keep me posted
How it works

A session, in plain sight.

What this screen shows

Start with the real moment. Then see the coaching response.

The buttons below are sample questions an educator might bring into eduimpact.ai. Choose one and the session mock updates: first the educator's prompt, then a reviewed coaching response grounded in K–5 practice.

Reviewed means human review shapes what the system draws on. The AI extends coaching support; it does not replace the human coach.

Pick a real question. See the response.
eduimpact.ai · coaching session · reviewed
You

My readers are stuck on multisyllabic words. I've already done the standard syllable-division lessons twice and we're not moving.

eduimpact.ai

It sounds like your kindergarteners are finding multisyllabic words particularly challenging despite multiple attempts with syllable division.

Introduce a "Word of the Day" where you choose a new multisyllabic word each day, break it down together, then use it in different sentences throughout the week.

Use picture books that contain familiar multisyllabic words to read aloud daily. Highlight these words when reading and have students track them.

Would you like more ideas on engaging read-alouds that include these types of words?

What it's grounded in

Coaching, not search.

400+
Coaching scenarios
Grounded in reviewed instructional practice.
1M+
Curated coaching resources
Books, papers, and field guides from the people who built modern instructional coaching.
0
Student outcome data collected
Built for educator reflection, not student observation. There is no field anywhere in the product for student names, demographics, IEP information, or assessment data.
On every plan. There is no field anywhere in the system for student names, demographics, IEP information, or assessment data.

Ready to try a session?

eduimpact.ai isn’t open yet. Leave your email and we’ll tell you when it is, along with the occasional note on what we’re building.

Keep me posted See pricing
How it works for your district

Three layers, one coaching system.

Each layer makes the layer above it stronger. Teachers get support the moment they need it. Coaches focus where it matters. Leaders see where to invest attention.

For your teachers
Every classroom teacher in the deployment.

Get coaching support the moment you need it.

Coaching shaped by your curriculum, available the moment a teacher needs it. Reviewed by your coaches — it gets sharper as they review.

For your coaches
Instructional coaches on staff.

Focus your effort where it matters.

eduimpact.ai handles the in-between: the 9pm question, the teacher who wouldn't book a meeting. Your in-person time goes where only humans can.

For your leadership
Principals, instructional directors, district admin.

See the growth across your school or district — grade by grade, subject by subject.

Patterns of teacher growth over time, surfaced as you'd expect from instructional coaching done well. Aggregated across grades, subjects, and schools. No score, index or ranking is attached to a named educator. The signal sharpens as your coaches review it.

What "reviewed" means

Every session, in the loop.

Teacher
Brings a real moment.
The Tuesday-afternoon question. The thing they wouldn't book a meeting for.
eduimpact.ai
Responds.
Grounded in 400+ coaching scenarios your coaches have reviewed.
Coach
Reviews it.
A reviewing educator rates the response. The human grade.
System
Gets sharper.
Every educator in your school benefits from every review your coaches have done.
…and the loop runs again, with your coaches' fingerprints on it.
Run the math on your district

How much coaching is actually reaching your teachers?

Enter your district's real numbers. We'll show what's reaching teachers today, what it would cost to close the gap by hiring alone, and where eduimpact.ai changes the math. In large Texas districts, most K–5 buildings sit at 45–55 teachers per coach — the slider below defaults to a mid-size suburban shape; adjust to yours.

Your district

150
3

Leakage factors

15%
20%

Financial inputs

$65,000
1.30×

Benchmark

1:45

Effective coaching capacity

1.95

coaches' worth of instruction actually reaching teachers, after 35% lost to travel and admin

Your actual coaching ratio

1:77

vs. the 1:45 benchmark — 71% above target

⚑ Coaching desert — high isolation risk
Coaching desert detected. At this ratio, most teachers go weeks between meaningful coaching contact. Isolation at this level is associated with higher voluntary attrition.

Coaches needed to reach benchmark

+1.4

additional effective FTE required — accounting for leakage, you'd need to hire 3–4 people to get 1.4 coaches' worth of real coverage

Annual cost to close the gap via hiring alone

$281K

fully-loaded cost for 3–4 new coaches, before onboarding or first-year turnover risk

eduimpact.ai approach Extend the coaches you already have. Capture the in-between moments without adding headcount.

Every figure here is grounded in either peer-reviewed research, government data, or field conversations with district and charter instructional coaches — including 1-IC-per-campus public districts (low travel) and multi-site charter networks (higher travel). The leakage model is a working assumption you can adjust to your district's reality.

A

Effective Capacity

Even when a coach is on payroll, a real share of the day goes to transit between sites and administrative load — scheduling, reporting, non-instructional meetings. We call this leakage. The formula converts raw headcount into actual coaching hours reaching teachers.

effective_coaches = coaches × (1 − travel_leakage − admin_leakage)
B

Current Ratio — The Island Score

Total teachers divided by effective coaches gives the real ratio. The higher this number, the more isolated each teacher is from meaningful coaching support. Above 1:60 we call it a coaching desert. That threshold is our own doctrine, calibrated against the isolation-and-attrition literature rather than drawn from a published standard.

current_ratio = teachers ÷ effective_coaches
desert_flag → current_ratio > 1:60
C

Hiring Gap

To reach the benchmark ratio, you need a target number of effective coaching FTEs. But every human coach you hire also suffers the same leakage, so you need to hire significantly more people than the gap suggests on paper.

needed_effective = teachers ÷ target_ratio
gap_effective = needed_effective − effective_coaches
humans_to_hire = gap_effective ÷ (1 − travel − admin)
D

Annual Cost to Close the Gap

The cost model uses fully-loaded compensation: base salary × benefits multiplier, applied to humans required. This excludes recruiting fees, onboarding load, and first-year turnover risk — so the real number tends to land higher than this card.

annual_cost = humans_to_hire × salary × benefits_multiplier

Research & field sources

26% direct-coaching baseline — Deussen, T. et al. (2007), "Coach" can mean many things: Five categories of literacy coaches in Reading First. REL Northwest. The travel + admin defaults are calibrated to roughly match this published direct-coaching share.
1:45 coach-to-teacher ratio — New Teacher Center (NTC) recommended staffing benchmark.
Effect of consistent coaching: +0.49 SD on instructional practice — Kraft, M.A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018), The Effect of Teacher Coaching on Instruction and Achievement: A Meta-Analysis of the Causal Evidence, Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. Effect sizes drop sharply when coaching scales without fidelity (Annenberg/Brown EdResearch for Recovery synthesis) — the lever is dose and consistency.
45–55 K–5 teachers per coach (large Texas districts) — derived from the standard one-IC-per-elementary-campus model and TEA enrollment data. Katy ISD reports ~94,785 students across 79 schools at a 14:1 student-teacher ratio, putting most K–5 buildings in this range.
Travel & admin leakage defaults (15% + 20%) — anchored in field conversations with district and charter instructional coaches. Public districts with one IC per building report low travel (closer to 5–15%); charter networks with multi-site coaches report 30–40%. Adjust the sliders to your district's reality.
Coach salary default ($65,000) — Texas-statewide median per Indeed (Dec 2025) and Salary.com (Mar 2026), $64K–$66K range. Katy ISD self-reported median runs ~$62–64K including the 2025–26 3% raise. National K-12 instructional coach medians span $63–80K depending on geography and tenure.
Teacher replacement cost reference — Learning Policy Institute (2024), 2024 Update: What's the Cost of Teacher Turnover? Tiered by district size: $11,860 small / $16,450 medium / $24,930 large.

Ready to scope a pilot?

We start with a single school or grade band. Pilot terms are written into the contract from day one.

Talk to our team See pricing